Personnel
Overall Objectives
Research Program
Application Domains
New Results
Bilateral Contracts and Grants with Industry
Partnerships and Cooperations
Dissemination
Bibliography
XML PDF e-pub
PDF e-Pub


Section: New Results

Matching problems and their applications

Participants : Laurent Baratchart, Martine Olivi, Gibin Bose, David Martinez Martinez, Fabien Seyfert.

This is collaborative work with Stéphane Bila (XLIM, Limoges, France), Yohann Sence (XLIM, Limoges, France), Thierry Monediere (XLIM, Limoges, France), Francois Torrès (XLIM, Limoges, France) in the context of the ANR Cocoram (see Section 7.2.1) as well as with, Fabien Ferrero (LEAT, Sophia-Antipolis, France) Leonardo Lizzi (LEAT, Sophia-Antipolis, France).

Filter synthesis is usually performed under the hypothesis that both ports of the filter are loaded on a constant resistive load (usually 50 Ohm). In complex systems, filters are however cascaded with other devices, and end up being loaded, at least at one port, on a non purely resistive frequency varying load. This is for example the case when synthesizing a multiplexer: each filter is here loaded at one of its ports on a common junction. Thus, the load varies with frequency by construction, and is not purely resistive either. Likewise, in an emitter-receiver, the antenna is followed by a filter. Whereas the antenna can usually be regarded as a resistive load at some frequencies, this is far from being true on the whole pass-band. A mismatch between the antenna and the filter, however, causes irremediable power losses, both in emission and transmission. Our goal is therefore to develop a method for filter synthesis that allows us to match varying loads on specific frequency bands, while enforcing some rejection properties away from the pass-band.

Figure 5. Filter plugged on a system with reflection coefficient L11
IMG/Figure5.png

Figure 5 shows a filter with scattering matrix S, plugged at its right port on a frequency varying load with reflection parameter L1,1. If the filter is lossless, simple algebraic manipulations show that on the frequency axis the reflex-ion parameter satisfies:

G 1 , 1 = S 2 , 2 - L 1 , 1 ¯ 1 - S 2 , 2 L 1 , 1 = δ ( G 1 , 1 , S 2 , 2 ) .

The matching problem of minimizing |G1,1| amounts therefore to minimize the pseudo-hyperbolic distance δ between the filter's reflex-ion parameter S2,2 and the load's reflex-ion L1,1, on a given frequency band. On the contrary enforcing a rejection level on a stop band, amounts to maintaining the value of δ(L1,1,S2,2) above a certain threshold on this frequency band. For a broad class of filters, namely those that can be modeled by a circuit of n coupled resonators, the scattering matrix S is a rational function of McMillan degree n in the frequency variable. The matching problem thus appears to be a rational approximation problem in the hyperbolic metric.

Approach based on interpolation

When the degree n of the rational function S2,2 is fixed, the hyperbolic minimization problem is non-convex which leads us to seek methods to derive good initial guesses for classical descent algorithms. To this effect, if S2,2=p/q where p, q are polynomials, we considered the following interpolation problem 𝒫: given n frequency points w1wn and a transmission polynomial r, to find a monic polynomial p of degree n such that:

j = 1 . . n , p q ( w j ) = L 1 , 1 ( w j ) ¯

where q is the unique monic Hurwitz polynomial of degree n satisfying the Feldtkeller equation

q q * = p p * + r r * ,

which accounts for the losslessness of the filter. The frequencies (wk) are perfect matching points where δ(S2,2(wk),L1,1(wk))=0 holds, while the real zeros (xk) of r are perfect rejection points (i.e. δ(S2,2(xk),L1,1(xk))=1). The interpolation problem is therefore a point-wise version of our original matching-rejection problem. The monic restriction on p and q ensures the realizability of the filter in terms of coupled resonating circuits. If a perfect phase shifter is added in front of the filter, realized for example with a transmission line on a narrow frequency band, these monic restrictions can be dropped and an extra interpolation point wn+1 is added, thereby yielding another interpolation problem 𝒫^. Our main result, states that 𝒫 as well as 𝒫^ admit a unique solution. Moreover the evaluation map defined by ψ(p)=p/q(x1),,p/q(xn) is a homeomorphism from monic polynomials of degree n onto 𝔻n (𝔻 the complex open disk), and ψ-1 is a diffeomorphism on an open, connected, dense set of 𝔻n. This last property has shown to be crucial for the design of an effective computational procedure based on continuation techniques. Current implementations of the latter tackle instances of 𝒫 or 𝒫^ for n=10 in less than 0.1sec, and allow for a recursive use of this interpolation framework in multiplexer synthesis problems. The detailed mathematical proofs can be found in [11].

Uniform matching and global optimality considerations

The previous interpolation procedure provides us with a matching/rejecting filtering characteristics at a discrete set of frequencies. It can serve as a starting point for heavier optimization procedures, where the matching and rejection specifications are expressed uniformly over the bandwidth. Although the practical results thus obtained are quite convincing, we have no proof of their global optimality. This has led us to seek alternative approaches allowing us to assess, at least in simple cases, global optimality of the obtained response. By optimality of a response we mean, as in classical filtering, a best match of the response in the uniform norm on a given pass-band, while meeting given rejection constraints on a stop-band. Following the approach of Fano and Youla, we considered the problem of designing a 2×2 loss-less frequency response, under the condition that a specified load can be “unchained” from one of its port. This classically amounts to set interpolation conditions on the response at the transmission zeros of the Darlington extension of the load. When the load admits a rational representation of degree 1, and if the transmission zeros of the overall system are fixed, we were able to show that the uniform matching problem over an interval, together with rejection constraints at other frequency locations, reduces to a convex minimization problem with convex constraints over the set of non-negative polynomials of given degree. In this case, which is already of some practical interest for antenna matching (antennas usually exhibit a single resonance in their matching band which is decently approximated in degree 1), it is therefore possible to perform filter synthesis with a guarantee on the global optimality of the obtained characteristics. The constructive aspects of this approach, relying on convex duality and linear programming, were presented in [16], together with an implementation using a SIW (substrate integrated filter). For antennas with a transmission coefficient of higher degree, like dual band antennas, we developed a convex relaxation of the matching problem which yields a set lower bounds on the matching error, for every considered degree of the overall system (matching system + load). This substantially improves Helton's approach, that furnishes a single global theoretical lower bound independent of the degree, obtained via an infinite degree H relaxation of the problem.A preliminary version of this approach was presented in [15], while a more detailed paper is under way. We consider this to be an important breakthrough concerning this classical problem in electronics. The implementation of the method involves solving a convex optimization problem on the cone of positive polynomials under some non-linear, yet convex, matrix inequality constraints. Solving the latter combining logarithmic barrier functions and Lagrangian relaxation techniques provided us, for example, with an excellent initial design for a matching network dedicated to an array of dual-band antennas with circular polarization, studied in the context of the ANR Cocoram. Design of matching networks for complex antennas is also considered in collaboration with LEAT, within the context of Gibin's Bose PhD.